Tuning In (to MLK)
This is something I wrote for morning announcements at Patrick Henry Elementary School around this time of year during one of my last years at work.
When I was a boy I didn’t watch the news much. When I watched TV, I’d usually skip right over it and change the channel to something I thought was more interesting.
But once in a while when I got to the news, I’d hear this -- voice. It was just a man speaking, but his voice sounded almost like music – the way that it would rise and fall, the way that sometimes he would hold a word long, almost like a note in a song, then let his words rest for a moment – to suddenly pick them up again with even greater power and purpose and energy than before. I had never heard anybody talk like that.
So my arm would be getting tired, because I wanted to change the channel – because back then there were no remotes, and you had to have your hand up on the knob on the TV to do that – but I couldn’t seem to change the channel while this man was talking.
And so I started tuning in to what he was saying – and the meaning of his words was as wonderful as the sound in the music of his voice. He was speaking of great ideas, of things like freedom, equality, and fairness. He was talking about treating other human beings as if they really were other human being – which, of course, is what we all are. This was in the 1960s, during the civil rights movement. By now I bet you may have guessed that the voice I was hearing belonged to Dr. Martin Luther King.
Many years later, I finally figured out what filled that voice with such power and purpose and music and beauty. His voice was filled with the sound of someone who cared about the whole world. Everybody. He never had the opportunity to meet you, but he cared about you – and about the children you’re going to have, and about the children your children will have. He was looking way ahead. He had been to the mountaintop of his own caring. He was dreaming the great dream of a world where all people treated other people as if they mattered, as if they really were – people – which, of course, we all are, wherever we are from, however we look, however we dress, and whatever languages we speak.
So what Dr. King helped teach me is that one person, one single human being, can literally care about the whole wide world. Which is pretty amazing when you stop and think about it. One person: the whole world.
And I hope very much that as you begin to get a little older, you’ll start asking yourselves the question raised by Dr. King: How big can I care? Because a whole lot depends on how you will decide to answer that question.
Because finally, even though Dr. King accomplished so much, his dream will come true only when enough of us start that long climb up the mountain to discover the content of our character and the far horizons of how much we can care.
When I was a boy I didn’t watch the news much. When I watched TV, I’d usually skip right over it and change the channel to something I thought was more interesting.
But once in a while when I got to the news, I’d hear this -- voice. It was just a man speaking, but his voice sounded almost like music – the way that it would rise and fall, the way that sometimes he would hold a word long, almost like a note in a song, then let his words rest for a moment – to suddenly pick them up again with even greater power and purpose and energy than before. I had never heard anybody talk like that.
So my arm would be getting tired, because I wanted to change the channel – because back then there were no remotes, and you had to have your hand up on the knob on the TV to do that – but I couldn’t seem to change the channel while this man was talking.
And so I started tuning in to what he was saying – and the meaning of his words was as wonderful as the sound in the music of his voice. He was speaking of great ideas, of things like freedom, equality, and fairness. He was talking about treating other human beings as if they really were other human being – which, of course, is what we all are. This was in the 1960s, during the civil rights movement. By now I bet you may have guessed that the voice I was hearing belonged to Dr. Martin Luther King.
Many years later, I finally figured out what filled that voice with such power and purpose and music and beauty. His voice was filled with the sound of someone who cared about the whole world. Everybody. He never had the opportunity to meet you, but he cared about you – and about the children you’re going to have, and about the children your children will have. He was looking way ahead. He had been to the mountaintop of his own caring. He was dreaming the great dream of a world where all people treated other people as if they mattered, as if they really were – people – which, of course, we all are, wherever we are from, however we look, however we dress, and whatever languages we speak.
So what Dr. King helped teach me is that one person, one single human being, can literally care about the whole wide world. Which is pretty amazing when you stop and think about it. One person: the whole world.
And I hope very much that as you begin to get a little older, you’ll start asking yourselves the question raised by Dr. King: How big can I care? Because a whole lot depends on how you will decide to answer that question.
Because finally, even though Dr. King accomplished so much, his dream will come true only when enough of us start that long climb up the mountain to discover the content of our character and the far horizons of how much we can care.







17 Comments:
Sham
http://enhancelifethinktank.blogspot.com/
HAZZBUZZ: No, I don't. My impression of MLK was that he was the only genuine orator I've ever heard. His great speeches somehow expressed, in their tone and meter fully as much as their content, that power of caring that was behind his actions.
I guess what I'm really saying is that charisma may be too superficial a word to describe his gift, because yes, there are plenty of smart "charismatic" people who attract massive followings but turn out to be corrupt. I find myself putting it in quotes because personally, I'm always left scratching my head - How can this guy possibly have millions of broadly smiling followers in, for example, his teleministry?
PAULINE: Wow . . . When you put it like that, the last seven years seem even more messed up because we could have installed one of the peaceful chimps instead.
Finally at the nadir of spiritual evolution one governs all the products that emanated from him. He is not tainted by desires and is engaged in the pursuit of pure knowledge. The bliss experienced by such a man is of a much higher quality when compared to ordinary worldly men.
As the entire world is a product of his mind for him absolute compassion becomes a natural thing.
And because of the intensity of their compassion they communicate spontaneously to one and all.
May be people like MLK belong to this category. What do you think?
One caveat I might have – but you may not be suggesting this – is that enlightenment is a kind of permanent state that people reach once and for all and that makes them almost different in kind from other human beings. Again, a big topic – what is “enlightenment.”
love.
i think-
of lands past.
few went aghast,
few went fast,
few remain with mast,
few still last.
those lands which
still speak-
wanted a better day,
more improved way,
and more say.
what i see now will be
there till ever's end-
there will be a song sung,
of which a few will be hung,
few who will bear a better tongue,
few will wrong,
a few will throng,
few will belong.
hearts will breath,
earth can heat,
but never cheat.
our wheat
will become caveat
our race's(human race) neat
will keep meat,
for those can reach the seat,
will need prosper virtue,
to grasp the opportune.
Found you through Carrie at Fully Caffeinated. I look forward to being part of this lovely conversation.
I resonate with your passion for the heart of spirituality and religion.
VISHESH: I'd definitely need the Cliff Notes for this...!
RIVERSGRACE: Look forward to visiting your blog. My asteroid’s presently doing a wide rotation in my blogosphere due to some other commitments in recent weeks, but I’ll get there – you’re on my list.
“Word” is everything. Let us take the word ‘enlighten’. The right awareness lightens the burden of existence, whereas as the wrong type of awareness increases the burden.
But there is a gray area when the change is in the mould. Everyone who gets admission to Harvard doesn’t come out successfully. Those who come successful do get established in a new identity and experience a more enlightened existence. (ref.: the movie ‘Legally Blonde’). For the lesser mortals even the degree becomes a burden.
It could be that's how it works; my best guess would be that it doesn't. One example: I read that in rejecting the attempts of some of his followers to deify him, the Buddha, in his old age, told them that he continued to struggle with holding to his own Eightfold Path.
But you may not mean to suggest a condition of having fully arrived in the way that I'm questioning; later in your comment you refer to a "more enlightened existence," which is the kind of terminology I'd want to use.
EM: I feel the same. I was eleven when he was shot.
“Authentic” to me is the key word. It seems to me that he internalized what I see as the most inspired aspects of Christianity and spoke and really lived from out of that. So it came across as first-hand and entirely genuine, not preachy.
Post a Comment