Saturday, July 25, 2009

Demystifying Spirituality: Detachment

The word detachment is easily misunderstood. First, it’s a negative way of referring to something highly positive. Second, the word has connotations that can sound cold and aloof, as in clinical or scientific detachment – or even bring to mind the psychopathology of “attachment disorders,” which are characterized by low levels of emotional attachment to others.

More Than an Ego (Was that the Bee Gees?)

Everyone has a sense of themselves as mattering more than others, maybe more than everyone else put together. Too absurd for most of us to hold as an actual belief, it nevertheless describes a certain fundamental feeling that we have for ourselves from very early in life. And although egoism has value up to a point – the more so the younger we are – we are called to outgrow it. We are called by a greater, growing sense of who we are by whose light we recognize egoism as a narrow and unrealistic perspective – one that’s finally harmful to ourselves as well as others.

So you might say that anyone who experiences detachment from ego experiences “attachment” to this larger, more generous sense and idea of where we stand in relation to the wider world. “Attachment” here really isn’t the right word because of its clingy (egoistic) connotations, but I use it to help suggest that detachment is a warm, human thing that doesn’t involve becoming cold, aloof or distantly otherworldly in the way a saint might be portrayed in a movie. Detachment means stepping into a perspective that is more passionately caring and more realistic than ego’s – one that doesn’t skew and distort all that we see according to our personal desires and our frustrations when these are unmet.

It’s Not Unusual… (although I can’t vouch specifically for Tom Jones…)

While the word detachment is usually used to refer to people who have gone a long way toward making this more generous self and perspective their home – i.e., their primary identity – detachment is best thought of as a process. One that, it seems to me, many of us have already gotten underway with to some extent. Consider, for example, the way that many of us become better workers as we begin to do our work with less ego involvement. A personal example: in my twenty-three years of working with children, I only had to physically restrain students twice. That second time, I had no other options. The first, however, early in my career, really wasn’t necessary. Long story short is that my twenty-five year old ego got hooked by a fourteen year old’s.

Or consider the truism about “mellowing with age.” While not true for everyone, it’s certainly true for many people – that as they grow older, the rough edges of their personalities even out. I think of my dad and a number of uncles and aunts who, as they grew older, gradually became more willing to listen to different points of view and much more open to people unlike themselves than they were when they were younger.

As members of the WWII generation who had little exposure to alternatives – at that time, popular culture in the west was still pretty much uninfluenced by eastern religions – they tended to either embrace their inherited religious tradition as they received it or reject spirituality and religion altogether. Terms like “spiritual growth,” “egoism” and “detachment” just weren’t phrases you’d have heard from any of my older relatives. Yet without talking the talk, most of them walked the walk -- moved, over the course of their lives, toward greater breadth of vision and depth of compassion.

“Detachment” is a process of leaving behind disproportional self concern and the shrill, defensive emotions that accompany it to discover that we have a greater heart and a broader vision of our place in the world and our relations to others. Detachment is seeing self and others through eyes that are our own and yet more than our own.

19 Comments:

Blogger mistipurple said...
if i had the wisdom of detachment many years ago, i could have avoided many mistakes which i am still trying to undo.
but as you said, it takes years before our rough edges get smoothen.
by then, with three quarters of our feet in the ground, it's pretty hard to play catch-up.
still, detachment is a good thing. we become more objective.
9:15 PM  

Blogger SusieQ said...
"As members of the WWII generation who had little exposure to alternatives ......................................................................... ............... Terms like “spiritual growth,” “egoism” and “detachment” just weren’t phrases you’d have heard from any of my older relatives. Yet without talking the talk, most of them walked the walk -- moved, over the course of their lives, toward greater breadth of vision and depth of compassion."

This is a pleasing paragraph. And right on! You were gracious here. I liked that.

After reading your post, I have a much better understanding of the kind of detachment you are talking about. I wonder what is likely to cause a person to begin this process of detachment. What inspires them to go in that direction? I can think of a few causes.
12:14 AM  

Blogger Paul said...
Misti – “Too soon old too late smart” – that has to be a saying that applies to some extent to most of us. And depending what the issue is, it can be difficult to impossible to play catch up. But it’s possible to move on…

At the risk of evoking those cold, clinical associations people sometimes dislike about the word detachment, I have to say that that sounds right to me – that with detachment, our view of ourselves becomes more “objective.”

What this in fact means is that we become distanced from our pettier, smaller, most easily agitated emotions – which actually facilitates our more regular and more powerful experience of our deeper feelings and better nature.

Susie – Yeah… to me it’s finally walking the walk that matters.

“I wonder what is likely to cause a person to begin this process of detachment… I can think of a few causes.”

That’s a great question and you’ve got me wondering what causes you have in mind. Given how unique and complicated each of us is, I bet there can be lots of causes that range from smaller cumulative ones to major life-altering events.
10:30 AM  

Blogger vishesh said...
ha its the same fellow again isn't it , Mr.ego...but then there are a few people who know only to talk to the Ego...I guess to truly drop the ego , you need to grow away from trying to belong in the ego crowd :)
12:13 PM  

Blogger mistipurple said...
i became more objective when i saw the aftermath of my actions; actions which fed the emo part of me and not the regular me.

these actions can be devastating if they involve major changes to the company, which at one stage was part of an international chain. still, i think as a result of my action, i kept my soul. i couldn't survive feeding other's egos.
11:03 PM  

Blogger Paul said...
Vishesh - Yeah... and there are a lot of different ego crowds or clubs looking for recruits!

Misti - Sounds like you learned something from what was initially a negative experience...
11:24 PM  

OpenID mommymystic said...
Paul, bravo - for me, you defined detachment perfectly. I think of it as a tool. And it is interesting that you noted many people develop this kind of detachment naturally as they age - for me, this ties in so well to the Buddha's teachings on transience, which are tied to detachment. That everything changes, and everyone suffers, and when we pull back or detach from our 'me-perspective' we can see that clearly. Then detachment and compassion work together. As we age, we naturally become more aware of the truth of transience.
But as you know, I do think detachment can get 'misused', especially in Eastern traditions - that it can be used as an excuse for disengaging from the pain of the world to the point where it becomes cold. Or as a means of self-protection that contracts, rather than opens, the ego. It's one of those 'razor's edge' type things, I guess - have to find the right balance. - Lisa
12:01 PM  

Blogger Paul said...
Lisa - "But as you know, I do think detachment can get 'misused', especially in Eastern traditions - that it can be used as an excuse for disengaging from the pain of the world to the point where it becomes cold."

Is this something you've actually observed or heard of? When it comes to religious or spiritual detachment, I'm only aware of the kind I've described here - but my reading about eastern religion has been limited.

While it’s possible to have powerful specific experiences of what I'd call detachment, it falls more in the "spiritual realization" category, to use the experience/realization distinction you've made elsewhere – that is, it describes an habitual state of mind that makes us, in brief, better people.
1:50 PM  

Blogger Jan said...
Paul,
What a profound post. This may be the finest explanation of detachment that I have ever read. And it definitely ties it into compassion. When we let go of the ego and such a strong sense of self we naturally drift toward embracing others with lovingkindness. Definitely a misconstrued point that as we let go we get cold or hard. On the contrary, done prayerfully, with our highest intentions in mind, detachment aligns us with the heart and soul of another--and their highest purpose. :-) We see them as the sacred beings they are and honor their journeys...Beautifully done...Thank you for this.
9:21 AM  

OpenID mommymystic said...
Paul - I was thinking of the example from my post a couple of weeks ago from Tsultrim Allione's book - when she was mourning her child's death and a fellow Buddhist practitioner told her not to be so attached. So I don't think detachment is presented that way in teachings, but I think in formal practice it can happen, when one is trying to cultivate detachment consciously. I think it happened at one point for me, and feel I have seen it in others, to the point where things I would almost consider cruel were justified in the name of detachment.
So the way you are describing detachment here, as a way of being, resonates with me, but when it is consciously cultivated, I think it can be problematic. I am somewhat shy of this using this word now myself, for that reason.
4:14 PM  

Blogger Paul said...
Jan and Lisa - Looking at what you both have to say here, I'm thinking that an important distinction may be between genuine detachment and misguided ideas about it by folks who may not have had much by way of the actual experience...

It really isn't a word I use either - because of those deceptive connotations it can have. It's actually what I'm talking about in the latter part of my book, but if I recall correctly, I don't think I made use of the word at all.
5:36 PM  

Blogger crystal said...
I hate detachment :) I can't help thinking that what it really is is a way for people to emotionally distance themselves from people and things so that they won't get jurt. I think being passionate and involved about things is more emotionally healthy.
9:26 PM  

Blogger firebird said...
I like what Jan says--and agree that this is a very profound post and the best I've seen ever written about detachment!

Crystal's point is one you deal with in the post, she is thinking of a different kind of detachment from what Paul or Jan describe. I agree that being passionately involved is the best way to be, and also that when are free from the demands of our ego, we can live that intensely, without the fears that often hold us back.

Think of detachment as a positive--imagine if you found a big fat leech on your leg...
11:21 PM  

Blogger Paul said...
Crystal - Well, I guess THAT didn't work, lol! I kind of actually had you in mind when I wrote this post!

I think you hate the word detachment and the idea of emotional detachment - I don't know, somebody behaving like, say - "Solmes" was it, in "The Forsythe Saga??"

But that isn't what's meant by the word detachment in a religious context, where it refers to detachment from life-narrowing egoistic emotion. That sort of detachment removes obstacles to the kind of passion and impassioned action that you speak in favor of.

I think of the Dali Lama, for example. From what I've seen, I'd have to guess he's far along on the path of detachment from his ego. He'd probably have to be or what's going on in Tibet would have put him into clinical depression a long time ago. But he's able to remain passionate and involved in the larger world precisely because he's not ego involved and not going down the sinkhole of the anguish he'd feel if he were coming from an egoistic place.

Distancing yourself from your ego so as not to be hurt in self defeating ways or find your inner life contracted and diminished because of adversity is a good thing, isn't it?

Gosh, Firebird just posted what I’ve just written in different words. We’re ganging up on you...

Hope you know that I’ve enjoyed the "perspective" you’ve brought to my blog for years now, which is so similar to mine yet slightly different in some ways – a lot like Susie Q in that way.

Makes for good conversation – as well as generating ideas for blog posts…!

Firebird – You’re comment came in as I was writing and seems to be saying basically the same thing in different words that I just finished typing above in reply to Crystal…
11:47 PM  

Blogger crystal said...
Paul,

I know :)

I think I do not completely believe in the ability to splinter the self and get rid of a (bad) part called "the ego". I think that people like the Dalai Lama do what St. Ignatius did - he went from a pretty ego-filled selfish person to a guy who gave up position and helped the poor. But he didn't do it by losing the "bad" part of himself. He did it by falling in love, and that readjusted his priorities.
3:54 PM  

Blogger Ginny said...
May I weigh in on detachment. I have been thinking about this since the post.When a woman is pregnant she attaches to her growing unborn, at birth there is a detachment that quickly is followed by a reattachment at the breast. Weaning leads again to detachment and so goes the cycle.
Animals have a better system for this than humans, just watch birds.
My other thought is this attach, re-attach and detach is sort of a trinity. A process we need to be reminded of daily. As a health care provider I get great personal satisfaction from attaching to my patients.Sometimes I have difficulty detaching and removing my "self" from situations.When I let my self off the hook , we are all better served.
7:09 PM  

Blogger Paul said...
Crystal - OK, so I'm not as subtle as I thought... (I'll have to try to detach from that idea of myself...)

Seriously... I don’t believe in that ability either. I just can’t imagine that anyone ever completely loses their egoism. Also, I’ve never heard the sort of self-punishment or censoriousness that would come with labeling unhelpful emotions and thoughts as “bad” advocated as a spiritual way forward – but I have heard it explicitly warned against by authors I’ve read on this subject like Thich Nhat Hahn.

Ginny – “As a health care provider I get great personal satisfaction from attaching to my patients. Sometimes I have difficulty detaching and removing my ‘self’ from situations. When I let myself off the hook, we are all better served.”

That’s a good illustration of an important distinction. Here’s another more extreme example: parents who behave badly at their children’s sporting events.

They don’t behave badly because they love their children more than other parents love theirs. So if we want to call love an attachment, it definitely doesn’t attach in the manner that ego does…
9:39 PM  

Anonymous Daphne @ Joyful Days said...
Paul,

Great perspective in this article. I loved the phrase "Detachment is seeing through eyes that are our own yet more than our own".

I also agree that when we understand that we are part of a larger reality, that "ME" is bigger than we think, then we naturally detach from the smaller 'me' that is our ego.

I'm amazed that you continue to write so much given your condition, and am full of admiration, and am happy to know that you seem well, or as well as can be expected under the circumstances. Take care.
4:04 AM  

Blogger Paul said...
Daphne - "When we understand that we are part of a larger reality, that 'ME' is bigger than we think, then we naturally detach from the smaller 'me' that is our ego."

Well stated, and gets at the essentially positive nature of "detachment." And thanks for your kind words.
3:24 PM  

Post a Comment

Post a Comment


Religion Blogs - Blog Top Sites Blog Directory Top Blogs Spirituality Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory