Saturday, January 30, 2010

“Hope Springs Eternal…” in the Believing Breast?

“Man is, properly speaking, based upon Hope, he has no other possession but Hope; this world of his is emphatically the Place of Hope.” What, then, was our Professor’s possession? We see him, for the present, quite shut-out from Hope; looking not into the golden orient, but vaguely, all round into a dim copper firmament, pregnant with earthquake and tornado. … Doubt had darkened into Unbelief…

From “The Everlasting No” by Thomas Carlyle, 19th century essayist

Is hopefulness about life important to how you feel and live in the present? If so, and you hold religious or spiritual beliefs, do you consider them necessary to your hopefulness about life?

If you’ve rejected spiritual and religious beliefs, do you feel hopeless about life? Is that OK or hard to live with?

23 Comments:

Blogger Hayden said...
Hope and "Hope-less" is hard for me to think about, because it seems to me it's gradations, not absolute.

I hope to wake up tomorrow, and if I thought I would not - what would I do with that time? Certainly I would spend that time carefully - even if I decided that the deliciousness of sleep was the right way to go. And that mundane level of hoping I wake up tomorrow readily extends and colors everything.

Ultimately, my visions of integrated, balanced life have made a huge difference in the amount of aggravation I'm willing to tolerate without fuss. I suppose that is a kind of hope, but like in so many discussions, I see it as knowledge and revelation, not as faith.

When I had no spiritual understanding, I still believed in the science that said we are all related through a vast web of molecules and atoms and mystery, and that the value of a turnips life, or a gnat's life, was equal to my own. That hasn't changed, and I've always derived enormous comfort from the sense that even if we mess up the world for human habitation, mother earth will probably cook up some interesting new inhabitants who will like it better than this one. So - is that a form of hope? It sure made/makes human stupidity easier to tolerate.
12:01 PM  

Blogger tuti said...
i have Hope for a better tomorrow.
sometimes being religious firms up that thought. till i get disillusioned, then i lose Hope, along with my religious convictions.
and the cycle goes on and on.

i hope not to lose Hope.
it keeps me hanging on.

life is really not that long, when you've reached a certain age.
i was just thinking, i might have ten years left of me. and then my colleague said, "how do you know, it might be five."
and i laughed away my blues.
12:41 PM  

Blogger Paul said...
Hayden and Tuti - Sounds like each of you refer to hope for more than one kind of thing. Main types seem to be hope for one's personal life and hope for life itself?
4:24 PM  

Blogger Lee said...
I am not spiritual. On a day to day basis, I am hopeful. Every day is an adventure. On the longer term, less so. Commonsense, a most uncommon commodity, suggests that our natural resources will run out - coal, gas, oil, land, food - the way the population is going, doubling every 30 years. No politician wants to deal with that and risk losing an election. But deal with it we will. I hope.
5:41 PM  

Blogger Pauline said...
I hope you’re not waiting for a hopeful observation from me, as there is little hope that I will change my belief system based on the hope of some future fulfillment. I’m optimistic about my personal life to a hopeful degree but don’t hold out much hope for humankind as a whole. (There. I think I covered all the definitions. I'm hoping, after all this, that you don’t smack me with something. I’ve been watching too much news, I think. Either that or I really need to get some solid sleep)
7:24 PM  

Blogger Paul said...
Lee and Pauline - There seem to be more and more people who aren't given to alarmist or dramatic points of view who have become seriously concerned with the behavior of our species. Me too.

Lee, I've noticed the same thing. It's unworkable: finite planet, finite resources and a population now adding to itself by another billion at regular intervals with nobody talking about it, especially in leadership positions.

In addition to one's own life and that of the species, there's the matter of whatever’s going on with being itself. What's the big picture? What is it we're all a part of and where is that headed?
8:08 PM  

Blogger SusieQ said...
I am hopeful. I am hopeful in a general sense as well as in specific situations. To hope is to not give up. To hope is to not give up on others, on yourself, on life itself. Answers can come when you are hopeful. Solutions can arise.

If you are without hope, you stand a chance of overlooking the answers and missing the solutions.

I am not sure my spiritual beliefs drive my hope as much as my hope drives my spiritual beliefs....if that makes any sense.

When you hope, you keep on keeping on. Hope enables you to keep on keeping on.
12:59 AM  

Blogger Paul said...
Susie - That rings true for me. In my late teens through early twenties, when I was becoming hopeless about life, I was also becoming more and more lethargic. It was truly hard to get myself out of bed in the AM to go to work.

After the experience I mention in the book under “June Night, this turned around literally overnight. The recovery of energy came with my recovery of hope.
12:49 PM  

Blogger crystal said...
I'm cautiously hopeful some of the time - hopeful that everything isn't meaningless, that there's a point to things - so I guess that hope is tied to religious beliefs. But when I get depressed, I lose hope in this life and anything that might come after.
5:09 PM  

Blogger Paul said...
Crystal - So religious belief helps support hope - but not all that effectively? Or maybe without the beliefs you'd feel far less hope, or none?
10:45 PM  

Blogger Hayden said...
ah well, if one confines hope to personal life... well then... I don't hope at all. Perhaps things will go well, perhaps they won't. Seems a gamblers shot no matter how you slice it; I don't expect or ask for "justice" based on some vague sense of righteousness & equity. In that case I certainly "hope" that things will go well, but it's not a spiritual hope at all, just a gambler's wish.

I've never expected *justice* on a personal level, it's simply not evident to me that this has any foundation.

On a grand scale it's easy to feel despair over the increasing degradation of physical conditions. But... this must be the same feelings of a small entity sitting beside a large decaying corpse. They feel their own world in danger and don't see the larger picture, the critters that will batten and thrive on the local destruction.

I see humans and our planet that way. Looks awful when you think of oil and population etc., but then when you imagine the new life forms that Gaia will create to batten on our waste..... well, it will be interesting, even if I (humans) won't be able to see the results.
11:58 PM  

Blogger crystal said...
I guess I am mixed up about this :) I hope that things will go the way I want them to here on planet earth, but it doesn't seem like believing in God can guarantee that. So I do get hopeless about things sometimes. But I have another hope that somehow things will still make some ultimate sense eventually - a different kind of hope that religion is maybe better at guaranteeing.
1:36 AM  

Blogger Hilary Melton-Butcher said...
Hi Paul .. I would call myself an English Christian - though I'm interested in all religious concepts, especially spiritual ideas, which I will explore more in the future. I am a reserved Christian .. I keep my religious thoughts to myself - us English!

I live in hope .. so I keep learning and definitely will do more reading (I still have your book to read! .. it will be read)

Look after yourself and have a good week - Hilary
3:54 AM  

Blogger Paul said...
Hayden - Would this be a correct or incorrect way of stating your idea of grand-scale hope: if people mess up, then some other species will come along to replace us and hopefully do a better job?

If I've stated it correctly, then could this be viewed as a hopeless outlook as much as a hopeful one?

Crystal - I make that distinction too - between our species messing up versus, as Hayden says, hope on a grand scale...

Hilary - Please feel free to send an email when you read it, I'd really be interested in your take. I wrote Original Faith in a way that uses quite a lot of language from Christianity since that’s my heritage too, but I avoid all doctrinal aspects - both because it's experience and not doctrine that's made a difference in my life, and because I wanted it to be useful to people outside the Christian tradition.
11:18 AM  

Blogger Hilary Melton-Butcher said...
Hi Paul- I will .. I'm not into reading as such at the moment - but it's on the list as such, meditation too, and exercise - longer days, more light, warmer times and only one person to look after gives me hope that I can factor in those three - disclipline my girl!!

Go well and you too will enjoy the warmer times .. Hilary
12:14 PM  

Blogger DESPERADO said...
you always ask difficult question!
7:51 PM  

Blogger firebird said...
Hope is the flip side of despair. Who would choose despair? We are hard-wired to have both options.

Hope is available to us regardless of any context. It's an attitude, a feeling, not an expectation of a particular outcome. It doesn't work too well if you tie it to a scenario.

Therefore we can fight for the survival of the species, just because it's the right thing to do. Whatever happens, it's OK in the end. It's the fight we are here for, not the result.

That's my concept of hope--like a penny on the street, it's there, why not pick it up? Doesn't matter if you can't buy anything with a penny...
9:47 PM  

Blogger Paul said...
Hilary and Desperado – Thanks for checking in --

Firebird – Hope for life or for being itself isn’t tied to a scenario, as you say, for me either. It’s existential and not something I have or need reasons for.

I have trouble though with the idea of choosing hope vs. despair. Personally, I didn’t experience it that way.
11:49 PM  

Blogger Hayden said...
"if people mess up, then some other species will come along to replace us and hopefully do a better job?"

humm, the problem with that statement is that it is based in values, a values-based assumption that *this* earth is the best of all possible earths.

I'd suggest that had our species come along 3 million years ago, we'd have liked it a lot less (and maybe died out more quickly, never having the chance to mess things up!)

But... we evolved during a time that is absolutely perfect for our species, we are able to adapt ourselves to life on most of the earth...instead, like most species, of being rather limited.

That abundance has given us the chance to expand until we've quite soiled our nest, perhaps irretrievably.

I'm guessing that the critters living on sulphur down in the ocean vents think that hellish heat is the best of all possible worlds, and can't understand how we could like our carbon-dioxide/oxygen poisoned one.

I'm making this up as I go along, Paul - but it seems to me that we evolved at a crucial moment in the life of the earth, and this has enabled us to influence (damage) the evolution of the earth itself, to our own detriment.

I figure the earth will go chugging along without us, and the new voices will be saying things like "oooh, boiling oil, delicious!" OK, not oil, because we're eliminating that, but you catch my drift.

More than a few of my buddies think Gaia is herself sentient, our role is something akin to a nervous system, and our antics are now giving her indigestion. This could be a dangerous move for humans. A major Gaia urp is a pretty scary notion.
5:21 PM  

Blogger Paul said...
Hayden - For me, your thoughts bring these distinctions to mind - that there's hope for:

Our individual lives

The species

Some other species that comes along after we die off

Life or being itself
12:19 PM  

Blogger vishesh said...
hope...pope..dope..soak..loaf..
9:45 AM  

Blogger Hayden said...
humm.

hope for our individual lives?
- some hope, not an overwhelming amount. depends on whether or not we, as a species, can evolve quickly.

Our spirit, now - that's a different matter, isn't it?

hope for the species?
- same

other life forms after us?
- of this I have little doubt. I'm confident that other life forms will find our debris yummy. This is being worked on consciously, now, by our species. Paul Stamets has made remarkable progress using fungus to clean up the most noxious pollutants. Will we adopt it (and other techniques) widely enough, and in time to preserve this world for our species? That's where big doubt comes in.

hope for life itself?
I have no doubts. But to me, stones have consciousness, so I cast a broad net. So I guess you'd say I trust/have confidence in spirit.
11:07 AM  

Blogger Paul said...
Vishesh and Hayden - Thanks, your comments are giving me ideas for my next post...
8:40 PM  

Post a Comment

Post a Comment


Religion Blogs - Blog Top Sites Blog Directory Top Blogs Spirituality Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory